Inside Job (2010)
Inside Job is the clearest and most comprehensive explanation I have seen
of the origins of the recent global financial meltdown that has stripped
millions of citizens worldwide of their life savings even as the powerful
financiers who perpetrated the meltdown have walked away not only scot-free
of criminal prosecution but with hundreds of millions of dollars in
"executive compensation." From its A to B to C narrative, evenly intoned by
Matt Damon and sustained by largely rational testimony throughout, to the
movie's pervasive organization of ample information into well-designed
graphics, Inside Job is a tour-de-force of clarity and a clarion call to
action. It names (and, when possible, interviews) specific persons and
implicates specific policies that contributed to and perpetuated the
banking and mortgage industries' deregulation over the Reagan, Bush,
Clinton, Bush, and Obama administrations and interviews dozens of figures
on both sides of the culpability aisle, all in nonpartisan fashion.
Although neoconservatives and financial industry executives will likely
grouse about how they come out in Inside Job, they are largely implicated
by their own words or intransigence in congressional testimony as well as
their duplicitous answers or failure to respond to simple ethical questions
such as, "It's true that any citizen can walk into those hearings and state
his or her opinion, but do you think that's on the same footing as your
paying $700,000 to lobbyists to promote your views?" Because of the
understated urgency and critical care with which it presents the evidence,
I hope that Inside Job becomes this year's An Inconvenient Truth. While it
will never convince the partisan minions who long ago took sides against
ethical practices, societal welfare, and the American dream, I have for the
past 12 years believed that rolling back deregulation and the corporate
takeover of the American political system is the most pressing issue that
confronts our freedom and our future. 5 stars. (11-30-2010, posted 3-3-2016)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home